HTPC face-off: VIA EPIA EX vs. AMD 690G

July 27, 2007 | 12:32

Tags: #690g #atx #avi #bluray #c3 #component #composite #cx700 #ddr2 #definition #dvi #epia #ex #h264 #hddvd #high #htpc #igp #low #power #processor #spdif #usb #xvid

Companies: #amd #via

Xvid Encoding:

We tested video encoding performance using VirtualDub-MPEG version 1.6.15 and a multi-threaded version of the Xvid codec, along with the LAME MT MP3 encoder for encoding audio. We did a two-pass encode of a 15-minute 276MB digital TV recording with a target file size of 100MB.

Xvid Encoding

VirtualDub MPEG-2 1.6.15, Xvid 1.2 beta, 276MB .mpg to 100MB .avi

  • EPIA EX 15000G (1.5GHz C7, 1GB DDR2 533MHz, 7200RPM HDD)
  • EPIA EX 15000G (1.5GHz C7, 1GB DDR2 533MHz, 32GB SSD)
  • MSI K9AGM2 (AMD BE-2350, 1GB DDR2 800MHz, 7200RPM HDD)
  • MSI K9AGM2 (AMD BE-2350, 2GB DDR2 800MHz, 7200RPM HDD)
  • MSI K9AGM2 (AMD 5000+ 65nm, 1GB DDR2 800MHz, 7200RPM HDD)
  • MSI K9AGM2 (AMD 5000+ 65nm, 2GB DDR2 800MHz, 7200RPM HDD)
  • 5521
  • 5469
  • 1375
  • 1362
  • 1162
  • 1121
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Time in Seconds (lower is better)

5500 seconds equates to about 90 minutes. In comparison we usually wait less than 15 minutes for an X6800 when we test an Intel motherboard. Obviously the two aren't quite in the same league but the AMD systems still manage five times more performance due to the extra clock speed, extra core and better memory performance. We understand the system isn't designed with this in mind, but it's a part of our test suite anyway and it gives you a perspective of the mountains of performance difference.

Citing our Abit IP35 Pro article; it takes nearly eleven and a half minutes to complete the test instead, but uses 166W to do so. Comparatively, if you didn't care how long the test took, you'd be 70 percent more efficient if you came back straight after the test when using the Core 2 Extreme X6800 and Abit IP35 Pro system rather than the EPIA. However, for the same time length the Abit would spend 80 minutes idle at 110W, which would make the EPIA 70 percent more efficient instead. That's not taking into account OS power saving features like sleep, hibernate or standby that come into play after a set amount of time idling.

MP3 Encoding:

We used LAME MT for our audio encoding test - it's the multi-threaded version of the popular LAME MP3 encoder. We ran tests with both Intel's and Microsoft's compilers - naturally, the Intel compiler resulted in some performance increases on Intel's processors. We converted all 18 tracks from Moby's popular Play album to a 192kbps variable bit-rate MP3.

MP3 Encoding (Intel)

LAME 3.97, Moby - Play, .wav to 192KHz .mp3, Intel Compiler

  • EPIA EX 15000G (1.5GHz C7, 1GB DDR2 533MHz, 7200RPM HDD)
  • EPIA EX 15000G (1.5GHz C7, 1GB DDR2 533MHz, 32GB SSD)
  • MSI K9AGM2 (AMD BE-2350, 1GB DDR2 800MHz, 7200RPM HDD)
  • MSI K9AGM2 (AMD BE-2350, 2GB DDR2 800MHz, 7200RPM HDD)
  • MSI K9AGM2 (AMD 5000+ 65nm, 1GB DDR2 800MHz, 7200RPM HDD)
  • MSI K9AGM2 (AMD 5000+ 65nm, 2GB DDR2 800MHz, 7200RPM HDD)
  • 1089
  • 1092
  • 233
  • 234
  • 189
  • 189
0
250
500
750
1000
1250
Time in Seconds (lower is better)

MP3 Encoding (Microsoft)

LAME 3.97, Moby - Play, .wav to 192KHz .mp3, MS Compiler

  • EPIA EX 15000G (1.5GHz C7, 1GB DDR2 533MHz, 7200RPM HDD)
  • EPIA EX 15000G (1.5GHz C7, 1GB DDR2 533MHz, 32GB SSD)
  • MSI K9AGM2 (AMD BE-2350, 1GB DDR2 800MHz, 7200RPM HDD)
  • MSI K9AGM2 (AMD BE-2350, 2GB DDR2 800MHz, 7200RPM HDD)
  • MSI K9AGM2 (AMD 5000+ 65nm, 1GB DDR2 800MHz, 7200RPM HDD)
  • MSI K9AGM2 (AMD 5000+ 65nm, 2GB DDR2 800MHz, 7200RPM HDD)
  • 1095
  • 1100
  • 236
  • 234
  • 190
  • 190
0
250
500
750
1000
1250
Time in Seconds (lower is better)

Again the AMD systems are five times faster at MP3 encoding. This is actually a viable test for a HTPC if you want to drop some music from your collection onto it for later listening, be prepared to come back in 20 minutes after you've had lunch.

MP3 Decoding


MP3 Decoding (Intel)

LAME 3.97, Moby - Play, .192KHz .mp3 to .wav, Intel Compiler

  • EPIA EX 15000G (1.5GHz C7, 1GB DDR2 533MHz, 7200RPM HDD)
  • EPIA EX 15000G (1.5GHz C7, 1GB DDR2 533MHz, 32GB SSD)
  • MSI K9AGM2 (AMD BE-2350, 1GB DDR2 800MHz, 7200RPM HDD)
  • MSI K9AGM2 (AMD BE-2350, 2GB DDR2 800MHz, 7200RPM HDD)
  • MSI K9AGM2 (AMD 5000+ 65nm, 1GB DDR2 800MHz, 7200RPM HDD)
  • MSI K9AGM2 (AMD 5000+ 65nm, 2GB DDR2 800MHz, 7200RPM HDD)
  • 170
  • 171
  • 52
  • 50
  • 44
  • 43
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
Time in Seconds (lower is better)

MP3 Decoding (Microsoft)

LAME 3.97, Moby - Play, .192KHz .mp3 to .wav, MS Compiler

  • EPIA EX 15000G (1.5GHz C7, 1GB DDR2 533MHz, 7200RPM HDD)
  • EPIA EX 15000G (1.5GHz C7, 1GB DDR2 533MHz, 32GB SSD)
  • MSI K9AGM2 (AMD BE-2350, 1GB DDR2 800MHz, 7200RPM HDD)
  • MSI K9AGM2 (AMD BE-2350, 2GB DDR2 800MHz, 7200RPM HDD)
  • MSI K9AGM2 (AMD 5000+ 65nm, 1GB DDR2 800MHz, 7200RPM HDD)
  • MSI K9AGM2 (AMD 5000+ 65nm, 2GB DDR2 800MHz, 7200RPM HDD)
  • 175
  • 177
  • 56
  • 52
  • 47
  • 43
0
50
100
150
200
Time in Seconds (lower is better)

Decoding is much the same as above, but the AMD system is only just over three times faster now. At worst.
Discuss this in the forums
YouTube logo
MSI MPG Velox 100R Chassis Review

October 14 2021 | 15:04

TOP STORIES

SUGGESTED FOR YOU